|
WE now come to an offshoot of Romanticism which has survived both the intellectualisation of music and the modern attempts at new forms.
All art is rooted in the folk, but with time outgrows their primitive lore. As music is exploited and made public, it tends naturally to break away from its origins. In the glare of world competition and criticism, music of a local or provincial type dies off, but not without throwing up unobtrusive shoots which proclaim the relationship between the folk-tune and the higher developments of musical art.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
MAHLER is a problem, one might almost say a cause célèbre, and a mass of literature, eulogistic and otherwise, has accumulated about his name. We may discuss Strauss, Reger, Pfitzner, coolly; but on a subject like Mahler, who touches us more nearly, it must be difficult for the modern musical critic to write calmly. His personality, moreover, is of a type that arouses controversy. He hurried through life in a fever of creative ardour, attempting at one and the same time to revolutionise the theatre and to leave to the world, after the example of the great masters, nine symphonies. He wrought at white heat and his work, highly provocative, bears traces of continuous tension.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
WE now pass to consider, in a cooler atmosphere, certain composers who by choice held aloof from the clamour and strife of the world.
Art of a theatrical nature is always sure of public success, the senses being ready to keep perpetual holiday and winning, as a rule with little difficulty, the consent of the intellect; but the North and Middle German is of a hard, non-sensuous nature, radically antagonistic to the glitter of the stage, and seeking artistic expression of a very different kind. Those who believe this non-sensuous quality to be the most valuable element in the German race, look to Brahms. They believe that if in the vaporous and sultry atmosphere which predominated in the "new" music of his day a man like Brahms could yet attain astonishing success, it is because he has contributed to music something fundamental and necessary. In his name, they too claim to be moderns.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next > End >>
|
| Results 7 - 9 of 15 |